What's Happening Now?

Latest news and information

Wiltshire News

How Can I Pay My Legal Fees?


Tuesday, 28 June 2011

Interim Costs Order

Family Law cases are often different to civil cases in that normally the wealth of the parties is controlled by one party rather than both of them.

In certain circumstances we can make an Application to the Court for an Order that the party, who controls the wealth, pay the legal costs of the other party in the first instance.

This type of Order is called an Interim Costs Order and is commonly known as a Hogan Order, after the case of that name.

The logic behind such an Order is to ensure that there is a “Level Playing Field” between the parties.

To be successful in such an Application one must satisfy the following criteria:

  • There must be a difference in financial circumstance between the parties, such that one party controls all of the assets, whilst the other cannot afford to meet their legal costs;
  • The party who controls the assets must be able to meet their own legal costs;
  • The party who seeks the Order must have a case for property settlement that has prospects of success;
  • The amount that the party seeks by way of property settlement will likely outweigh the legal costs Order sought; and
  • Evidence of the likely costs must be in evidence before the Court.

An extreme example of an Interim Costs Order is the case of Strahan (Interim Property Orders) [2009] FamCAFC 166.

The property pool in this case was estimated to be in excess of $80 million. The Husband had allegedly caused the Wife to incur significant legal costs in trying to identify and evidence his assets.

The Wife made Application to the Court for an Order that the Husband advance her $5 million toward her Legal Costs to enable her to continue the proceedings.

The Court was satisfied that the Wife needed funds to meet ongoing Legal Costs of the proceedings and that she did not have the funds to pay those costs. As such the Court did make an Interim Costs Order, that the Husband pay to the Wife’s Legal Costs, the sum of $1 million.

Please do not hesitate to make an appointment to discuss the above with our Team at Wiltshire Lawyers.


Anton A Richardson
Senior Family Lawyer and Mediator
Wiltshire Lawyers

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards legislation.

This article should not be considered as either formal or informal legal advice.  This article should only be read as general information relating to the particular subject matter it is written about.  The information may or may not apply to the reader's particular circumstances. Wiltshire Lawyers only purport to provide legal advice to clients who have provided detailed instructions and who have formally retained our services.


Return
Receive your FREE 45min consultation

We are here to listen to you - make an appointment now.

Why come to Wiltshire Lawyers?

We are friendly, approachable & professional
We listen to what you want
We provide practical advice
We stay focused on you

Latest Tweets  Twitter

Family Law Specialists

  • Family Law & De Facto Law
  • Parenting Issues
  • Divorce

Wiltshire Lawyers practises exclusively in the area of Family and De Facto Law. By focusing only on family and de facto law, we are able to provide you with the highest level of service. Read more

Client Service Charter

  • What we deliver to you
  • Our relationship with you
  • Our commitment to stay focused on you

Wiltshire Lawyers take great care in providing the best possible advice and sevice to ensure you obtain the outcome you desire. We take pride in giving you the care and attention you deserve.
Read more

Latest Wiltshire News

Issues between parents regarding the Immunisation of a child


Monday, 14 May 2012

In the case of Redden & Mains [2010] FMCAfam 1338 (9 December 2010) this issue was addressed.  From the earliest orders relating to the parenting of the children in the matter, there had been an important, but often overlooked, order in place preventing the children from being immunised. It was the father’s evidence that he only consented to the Injunction to immunisation so he could begin spending time with his daughter.

Readmore
Why the Long Face about Binding Financial Agreements?


Friday, 11 May 2012

There has been recent debate amongst Family Lawyers about the perils, or otherwise, of preparing so called “Binding” Financial Agreements for clients and, more particularly, those made prior to the commencement of a de facto relationship or marriage - the Australian version of the American “pre-nup”.

Readmore